Rotec AI

Tools

Bearing SelectorPick the right bearing, step by stepVerify a BearingLife, safety factor and fitsLoad CalculatorLoads from your machineWorked templatesFan, gear and shaft load templatesCross-ReferenceNewSame size from other makers. Free, no sign-upBearing AutopsyNewUpload a photo, get the likely causesFailure AnalysisRead damage, find the causeCondition MonitoringVibration, envelope, oil clues, RCMLubricationGreases, oils, cleanliness, oil lifeEquipment AnatomyMotors, pumps, fans, gearboxesFAQ and quick checksSearch the basics in plain languageFind a DistributorSuppliers by brand and city

Learn

Free calculatorsLife, grease, oil, loads and moreFind a bearingSize, rating and equivalents by designationFailure modesDamage types, causes and fixesCondition monitoringVibration, envelope, oil clues, RCMKnowledge libraryLubrication and reliability articlesBearings by machineMotors, pumps, mills, kilns and moreHow-to guidesBearing life, grease, failures, numbersShaft alignmentSoft foot, procedure, tolerances, heatField casesFailure investigations and monitoring cases (licence)Lubrication guidesGreases, oil systems, oil life and costQuick answersPlain-language answers to common questions

More

PricingPartnershipsContact
Field case · Oil analysis

Pulveriser gearbox: ferrous reading went from zero to 443 in a month, a thrust bearing was about to fail

Quick answer

A routine monthly oil test on a power plant gearbox showed the ferrous reading rising from zero to 352 and then 443. The gearbox was opened, the thrust bearing had deteriorated and was replaced for a fraction of the cost of a rebuild.

Case summary by Rotec AI · Last reviewed 6 November 2026

What the case covers

Takeaway. A clean baseline and a monthly test turned a jump in ferrous debris into a planned bearing change instead of a rebuild.
Read the full case, with the data and the numbers
All field casesBearing failure modesBearings by machine